Vilenica, Ana and Mentus, Vladimir (2025) Periphery in Movement: Organizing Against Rio Tinto in Serbia. In: New Divisions, Struggles, and Solidarities in South East Europe. Sociological Scientific Society of Serbia, Belgrade, p. 37. ISBN 978-86-905444-1-7
![]() |
Text
New-Divisions-Struggles-and-Solidarities-in-SEE-2025-Book-of-Abstracts (2).pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (479kB) |
Abstract
This paper initiates a conversation on how contemporary Eastern European peripheralization and the hegemony of the energy extractivist model impact civil action, introducing the concept of Periphery in Movement. Periphery in Movement seeks to expand beyond traditional civil society and social movement studies by addressing forms of organizing that build an incomplete and often tenuous territorial resistance. Through contested convergences and alliances among diverse civil actors, it aims to bring material disruptions to extractivist projects. We combine approaches from political economy, civil society studies, and social movement studies to establish this concept through three core specificities. The first specificity is the power imbalance, which we identify as the defining characteristic of Periphery in Movement, positioning it in opposition to corporate interests, the European Union, and national elites. The second specificity is the conflictual convergence of actors, spanning a diverse spectrum of civil actors who have undergone significant ideological and practical transformations from the Yugoslav Wars to the present. The third specificity focuses on the “how” of Periphery in Movement, examining the new repertoire of actions it employs. We develop this theoretical framework by analyzing Serbia’s ecological movement against the mining corporation Rio Tinto in the context of resistance to lithium extraction, bringing environmental pollution and loss of territories. The concept of Periphery in Movement is inspired by attempts to describe movements in Latin America that have emerged against the extractivist model as a form of “Society in Movement.” Unlike the Latin American concept of Societies in Movement, which often offer prefigurative elements in their organization against extractivism, movements in Eastern Europe bear a burden of past (and present) developments of civil society, including neocolonial transitional “democratization” through civil society, its soft and hard repressions by both international funders and national state, and its peripheral geopolitical position in Europe in territorial resistance.
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Institutional centre: | Centre for sociological research and anthropological research |
Depositing User: | D. Arsenijević |
Date Deposited: | 09 Jul 2025 06:53 |
Last Modified: | 09 Jul 2025 06:53 |
URI: | http://iriss.idn.org.rs/id/eprint/2744 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |